D&D Alignment test, what's your affinity?

True Neutral

"

MrSmiley21 schrieb:

http://easydamus.com/alignmenttest.html

Mine is Chaotic Neutral. Closer to evil than good.

Spoiler

"

Chaotic Neutral- A chaotic neutral character follows his whims. He is an individualist first and last. He values his own liberty but doesn't strive to protect others' freedom. He avoids authority, resents restrictions, and challenges traditions. A chaotic neutral character does not intentionally disrupt organizations as part of a campaign of anarchy. To do so, he would have to be motivated either by good (and a desire to liberate others) or evil (and a desire to make those different from himself suffer). A chaotic neutral character may be unpredictable, but his behavior is not totally random. He is not as likely to jump off a bridge as to cross it. Chaotic neutral is the best alignment you can be because it represents true freedom from both society's restrictions and a do-gooder's zeal. However, chaotic neutral can be a dangerous alignment when it seeks to eliminate all authority, harmony, and order in society.

Detailed Results:

Alignment:
Lawful Good ----- XXX (3)
Neutral Good ---- XXXXXXXX (8)
Chaotic Good ---- XXXXXXXXXXXXX (13)
Lawful Neutral -- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX (14)
True Neutral ---- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (19)
Chaotic Neutral - XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (24)
Lawful Evil ----- XXXXXXXXXXX (11)
Neutral Evil ---- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (16)
Chaotic Evil ---- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (21)

Law & Chaos:
Law ----- XX (2)
Neutral - XXXXXXX (7)
Chaos --- XXXXXXXXXXXX (12)

Good & Evil:
Good ---- X (1)
Neutral - XXXXXXXXXXXX (12)
Evil ---- XXXXXXXXX (9)

I found an interesting question with #7:

7. A powerful but corrupt judge offers you wealth if you'll testify against your friend. Do you:

#1 Condemn your friend and take the money?
#2 Take the money and testify, but try to keep your testimony ineffective?
#3 Refuse the offer and refuse to testify?
#4 Testify on your friend's behalf, no matter the consequences?

I picked #2 for a rational reason. First of all, if a judge was looking to pay people money to testify, he'd likely find another if I refused. So if I took the money, and gave ineffective testimony, not only would my friend get off the hook, but that judge would lose his case, + I get paid for helping a friend get off the hook.

Yes, I would absolutely lie my ass off to keep a friend from going to jail. If someone wants to pay me to lie so a friend doesn't go to jail, I'd do it. And given that we live in a system that lies to people on a regular basis, I sure as hell don't feel any obligations to be honest to shore up such a system. Sure, I'll swear on some book I don't care about. They can kiss my ass!

Some other affinities might find it dishonorable to testify against a friend. I do as well, IF you go up there and give them testimony that can convict your friend.

I chose 4 on that one, I don't have lots of friends, but the ones I have I cherish a lot, to the point that I would take a bullet for them if needed.

You might think that choosing the #2 is the one with most benefits and without setbacks, and perhaps you are right, but you might want to keep something in mind that it's a question about what would you do without displaying the outcome of such actions.

"Take the money and testify, but try to keep your testimony ineffective?"

Even if your intentions is to not screw up a friend, the possibility of that happening is not zero, and even if it's low, is still not zero.

I didn't choose that one because it would mean that I'm someone willing to put a friend at risk in exchange for dirty money. I can put myself at risk for dirty money, but a friend? I can't make a bet with their safety, even worse without their consent.

But well, that's just me, and I'm just like that because I have really good friends.

"

soneka101 schrieb:

You might think that choosing the #2 is the one with most benefits and without setbacks, and perhaps you are right, but you might want to keep something in mind that it's a question about what would you do without displaying the outcome of such actions.

"Take the money and testify, but try to keep your testimony ineffective?"

Even if your intentions is to not screw up a friend, the possibility of that happening is not zero, and even if it's low, is still not zero.

"Try to keep the testimony ineffective" is the key here. I'd try really, really hard, including lie to keep it ineffective. I would lie and even take the punishment for lying under oath if needed be. So I acknowledge a risk/reward scenario. With an extreme likelihood of me getting paid to help a friend out by someone who's a piece of shit. I view that as "Sticking it to the authorities". So this is very much about me getting a "one up" on them more than it is about the money. The reward is also an ego boost. Me falling on my sword by refusing to testify wouldn't help my friend or me. So this is about which action is more likely to have a favorable turn of events.

Something else, and this weighs in favor of a botched testimony being extremely likely to result in the acquittal of your friend is that their evidence must be complete shit if they have to pay somebody to testify. Which means, they probably don't know enough to even make a guess as to whether I'm lying or not.

I don't have that many friends in RL, but the few I do have are like family to me. Better than family, actually. They're super-bro status. If my friend needed help disposing of a body, I'd help. IMO, one "friend" is worth more than 100 acquaintances that you socialize with on occasion. When most people speak of "friends" in 2017, they're referring to FB friends, or coworkers they're on a good social basis with. So the term "friend" has very much been cheapened.

This is the biggest difference between Neutral, and Evil, whereas Evil would be more self serving. But I'm kinda with Chaotic Evil as far as having a potential to be belligerent toward established society, or authorities. How many people can say they've been tazed by the police? *Raises hand*.

The only "Good" traits I possess are those related to loyalty. I'm loyal to those who I consider "Friend". But my capacity for "Good" pretty much ends there. My loyalty never extends to communities, or even nations for that matter.

True Neutral

"

MrSmiley21 schrieb:

I'm betting you're probably Neutral Good.

I got bored. Interesting that I'm the only one who's identified Lawful so far this thread. Especially since I believe both US political party establishments are thoroughly corruptted by special interests.

scrotie confirmed establishment shill

"

ScrotieMcB schrieb:

Interesting that I'm the only one who's identified Lawful so far this thread. Especially since I believe both US political party establishments are thoroughly corruptted by special interests.

You think the system is corrupt, but you probably seek change through this corrupt system anyway. Maybe because you don't see a better alternative? Correct me if I'm wrong here. But if this is correct, that's still within the realm of being Lawful.

I on the other hand, seek change, even if it means a period of instability to correct it. To me, the ends justify the means. I'm not confident enough in governments or systems to believe wide sweeping changes, especially targeted at rooting up systemic corruption is possible from within these same systems.

The US system, in particular is left to open ended interpretations by political hacks in the judicial system. This is because the founders didn't properly translate clear intent/meaning into words. So that there is no misunderstanding. It's a rigged system with laws/rights subjected to open ended interpretation by those with ulterior motives. Rights are only good until some lawyer plays word games with intent/meaning before some judge who's motivated politically. Rights are usually taken away with swords/axes/guns, yet in the USA they're taken away with the pen.

"

Snorkle_uk schrieb:

scrotie confirmed establishment shill

GG Scrotie

enjoy ban

CN. The good and evil seemed to be well balanced.

Neutral Evil to Chaotic Neutral.
Thx for the fun, got bored as hell atm :D