question on Cpu doc ryzen tool support refered me here/amd shaders

supports busy wanted me to post here for possible dev response

im not sure if this game uses anti cheat but a cpu program for dynamic power plan and mask cpu sets to give benefits of smt off without doing it has functions like that help performance and in settings has a option Listed below.

Disable inpout64.dll loading fixes issues with av and anticheat but disables pbo/numa cores based controls that it can do which i don't need/use.

whatever the sysset cpu set mask t1 cores thing does with t1 cores to cpu sets makes my fps go up by alot on a old r5 3600 all core overclocked 4200mhz.5700xt strix 1950mhz undervolted 1440p avg 130 fps low NIS 77% high textures rest lower adaptive vsync 32gb 3600mhz ddr4

if this is used without loading .dlls will it risk my account at all and do you even run anticheat? otherwise i think just masks system cpu sets to optimize T1 threads on best cores with scheduler? i don't use the features that require it to be enabled .dll files . so i disable

https://www.overclock.net/threads/cpudoc-little-cpu-helper-tool-with-some-exclusive-features.1802082/

it may help others but vary greatly system to system and cpu generation of ryzen but wait for a reply from ggg.

and is there any suggestions for amd users on how to optimize the shader bar being greened out 3 4 mins every launch? even on nvme drive. pegging cpu

"

zackpathofexile#1657 schrieb:

supports busy wanted me to post here for possible dev response

im not sure if this game uses anti cheat but a cpu program for dynamic power plan and mask cpu sets to give benefits of smt off without doing it has functions like that help performance and in settings has a option Listed below.

Disable inpout64.dll loading fixes issues with av and anticheat but disables pbo/numa cores based controls that it can do which i don't need/use.

whatever the sysset cpu set mask t1 cores thing does with t1 cores to cpu sets makes my fps go up by alot on a old r5 3600 all core overclocked 4200mhz.5700xt strix 1950mhz undervolted 1440p avg 130 fps low NIS 77% high textures rest lower adaptive vsync 32gb 3600mhz ddr4

if this is used without loading .dlls will it risk my account at all and do you even run anticheat? otherwise i think just masks system cpu sets to optimize T1 threads on best cores with scheduler? i don't use the features that require it to be enabled .dll files . so i disable

https://www.overclock.net/threads/cpudoc-little-cpu-helper-tool-with-some-exclusive-features.1802082/

it may help others but vary greatly system to system and cpu generation of ryzen but wait for a reply from ggg.

and is there any suggestions for amd users on how to optimize the shader bar being greened out 3 4 mins every launch? even on nvme drive. pegging cpu

I read with interest... if it really works as well as disabling SMT even while leaving SMT enabled in the BIOS, it would be really useful, not just in POE.

Personally, I tried disabling SMT in the BIOS, and yes... everything runs much smoother, although FPS performance drops, of course.

But if it could be used on POE1/2 (especially 2), or if they implemented something similar directly in the client, it would solve the performance problems of many users.

I really hope GGG fixes this soon. After half a week of playing on POE2, I'm losing all my enthusiasm.

Yea its defintely nice i think it can work on non ryzen just not as well because it uses the cppc order to then put the threads to work and im guessing my all core overclock boosting way higher than normaly would is because of the power profile and how it loads the cores which leads to higher perfomance. on my single chiplet i do not own any newer gen ryzen to know how it will benefit anyone else but this is huge for me i think act 1 town i saw 30 40 fps just turning on when less people around even more and frametime steady!

amd anti lag on in my sitation is around 30 40 fps loss 25 30 it actualy ajusts the balance of cpu to gpu load in 1440p rather than being gpu pegged its most of the time even only time cpu ahead is in towns and upscaler causing less gpu load maybe balances out my system i am not sure.


https://gyazo.com/cfa04c502d78bfc190a0bf20c06a25b3 gyazo of my fps in kriar outside of a town 77% nis vulkan upscale off runs into the gpu being 2ms ahead of cpu 6 vs 8 load wise down to 105 fps by waypoint

https://gyazo.com/2162651e02c08f9d99f4265aede69e5d thread booster example low load outside of a town 10/12 cores changes dynamicly with need

config i use personally zen control is part tht needs the dll which i disabled https://gyazo.com/8338ae2c757553d59fca18fa27abad8b

process lasso setup with probalance high prioity gpu cpu and power profile is set to the cpu doc one so i set it to not change profile when in perfomance mode so dynamic power profile can work



some ai info edge pulled when i looked up the cpu bitmasking
The CpuSet system bitmask manipulation offers several benefits for users looking to optimize their CPU performance and manage system resources effectively. Here are some of the key advantages:
Smoother and Faster Experience: By manipulating the CPU's system bitmask, users can achieve a more efficient CPU experience, similar to SMT/HyperThreading off, while still retaining the benefits of SMT/HyperThreading on.
1
Dynamic Power Plan Manipulation: The utility allows for dynamic power plan manipulation, which can lead to improved power efficiency and reduced energy consumption.
1
Performance Gain: Users have reported a 5-7% CPU performance gain with the use of CPUDoc's power plans, which can be almost free of charge.
1
Improved RAM Latency: CPUDoc's power plans have been noted to give about 1ns better RAM latency compared to the Windows blanked plan, which can be crucial for applications that rely on fast memory access.
1

These benefits make CpuSet system bitmask manipulation a valuable tool for users seeking to enhance their CPU's performance and manage system resources more effectively.

"

zackpathofexile#1657 schrieb:

Yea its defintely nice...

but be carefoul... this is the VirusTotal report:
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/b573a5a5984104be356f86df7bc988314475ce7e33412c608a4079e1da2a74af
maybe not mean is a Virus, probable just a riskyware

I know is normal this flags for this kind of programs on VirusTotal... anyway:

+ it is not recognized as malware by AV engines
+ the warnings come from components (vulnerable drivers) that expose an attack surface. If another malicious program already running exploits them, it could elevate itself to the kernel
+ security depends on the source: if downloaded from github.com/mann1x/CPUDoc
and not from third-party repositories, the risk is low
+ it is useful to treat it as "potentially risky but legitimate" software: whitelist it, but use it only if necessary